The High Court at Patna reported that the petitioner alleged compliance with the writ court order. The court found no need to keep the matter pending and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1277 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2239 of 2014 ====================================================== |
|---|
| Vakil Singh, son of Late Dev Pujan Singh, resident of village- Nawada, P.S. Rasulpur in the district of Saran, Chapra .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mr. Deepak Anand, the District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra 3. Karanti Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Lahladpur, Saran, Chapra .... .... Opp.Parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kr. Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
| 8 27-01-2016 Sri Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to GA-13, submits that the order of the writ court has already been complied with in its letter and spirit. |
Accordingly, there is no need to keep the matter pending. The petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
NKS/U
Vakil Singh
State of Bihar
Deepak Anand
Karanti Kumar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
