Disposed

Dr.Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC27 Jan 2016CWJC/2984/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerning the quashing of an order stopping the petitioner from working as a Lecturer was disposed of. The Court held that since the petitioner's service validity was pending before a Commission, no positive order could be passed, granting liberty to seek further remedy.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy at the appropriate stage.

Dr.Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2984 of 2011

¶2

====================================================== Dr.Satyendra Kumar Singh, son of Shri Ram Pandit Singh, presently residing at Mohalla-West Shastri Nagar, Near Doon Public School, Gaya, Police Station-Rampur, District-Gaya.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development (Higher Education ), Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 3. Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya,Gaya. 4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya,Gaya 5. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya 6. The Principal, Swami Basudevacharya Anugrah Narayan CollegeDarhette Lari, Jehanabad. 7. The Principal Anugrah Memorial College,Gaya.

¶4

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

8 27-01-2016 Heard Sri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-10 as well as Sri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent/ Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

¶6

In the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order, whereby the petitioner was stopped from working as Lecturer in the Department of Psychology.

¶7

In this case, a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent/ Magadh University and in paragraph-4, a categorical stand has been taken that the validity of

¶8

Patna High Court CWJC No.2984 of 2011 (8) dt.27-01-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

service of the petitioner is already pending before the Justice S.B.Sinha Commission, constituted in the light of the order of the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶11

Since the validity of service of the petitioner is pending before the Commission, constituted in the light of the order of the Hon’ble Apex Court, the Court is of the opinion that at the moment, no positive order can be passed in the writ petition.

¶12

The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to

¶13

the petitioner to avail remedy at the appropriate stage.

¶14

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶15

NKS/U

Dr.Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Das Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Yadav Vs The Chairman Now M. D. Bihar State Electricity Board Now N. B. P. D. C. Ltd. and Ors.

Raja Ram Sah and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Vakil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Tanti Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Syed Ibrahim Hussain Rizvi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.