Allowed

M/s Acc Ltd, Patna v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC16 Mar 2016MA/724/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed appeals against dismissal on limitation grounds, condoning a delay of four years and eleven months because a substantive legal issue was pending before the Court in a related case. The matter was remitted to the Joint Commissioner for reconsideration.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders dismissing appeals on limitation grounds were set aside and matter remitted to the Joint Commissioner for decision on merits.

M/s Acc Ltd, Patna Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Appeal No.724 of 2014

¶3

=========================================================== M/s ACC Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provision of Companies Act, 1956 having one of its Branch Office at S.P. Verma Road, Patna through its Tax – incharge, Aditi Awasthi, D/o Rama Kant Awasthi, Resident of C/o ACC, Limited, 2nd Floor, Samriddhi Complex, S.P. Verma Road, P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna

¶4

.... .... Appellant Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through the Secretary - Cum - Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶6

The Secretary, Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Central Division, Patna

¶8

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Special Circle, Patna

¶9

.... .... Respondents

¶10

with

¶11

===========================================================

¶12

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 725 of 2014

¶13

===========================================================

¶14

M/s ACC Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Provision of Companies Act, 1956 having one of its Branch Office at S.P. Verma Road, Patna through its Tax - incharge Aditi Awasthi, D/o Rama Kant Awasthi, Resident of C/o ACC, Limited, 2nd Floor, Samriddhi Complex, S.P. Verma Road, P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna

¶15

.... .... Appellant

¶16

Versus

¶17

The State of Bihar through the Secretary - Cum - Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶18

The Secretary, Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, Patna

¶19

The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Central Division, Patna

¶20

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Special Circle, Patna

¶21

.... .... Respondents

¶22

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikash Kumar, A.C. to PAAG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

¶23

and

¶24

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 16-03-2016

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State.

¶27

Patna High Court MA No.724 of 2014 dt.16-03-2016

¶28

2 /3

¶29

These appeals under Section 79(2)(i) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 are directed against an order passed by the Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, Patna on 25^th of August, 2014 in Revision Case No. PT-140/2011 and Revision Case No. PT-141/2011 pertaining to Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2004-05, whereunder the learned Tribunal refused to interfere into the order dated 09^th of June, 2011 passed by Learned J.C.C.T.(A), Central Division, Patna, whereunder the Appeal Case No. ST/SL-86/2010-11 for the period 2003-04 and ST/SL87/2010-11 for the period 2004-05 were dismissed at the admission stage itself on the ground of limitation.

¶30

Assessment for the year 2003-04 and 2004-05 were finalized on 25^th of February, 2006. However, appeal against the said order was preferred after delay of four years and eleven months, which were dismissed by the learned Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeal) on the ground of limitation.

¶31

We find that following substantial question of law arises for consideration : Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Central Division, Patna and the Tribunal have erred in law in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal ?

¶32

Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the question as to whether gunny bags had to be charged at the rate as of the cement or whether trade discounts are allowable or not are the subject matter of consideration before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4050 of 2003 and other analogous cases pertaining to earlier assessment years.

¶33

Since the matter is pending before this Court on the same issue as are raised by the appellant, therefore, the appellant under mistaken advice did not file an appeal before the appellate authority within the period of limitation.

¶34

Since the issue is legal and is under consideration before this Court, it would be appropriate to condone the delay and to hear the appeals on merit in accordance with law.

¶35

It could not be disputed that the issue raised by the appellant are pending before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4050 of 2003. Once the issue is pending before this Court, pertaining to earlier assessment years, it will not be advisable to shut the door for consideration

¶36

Patna High Court MA No.724 of 2014 dt.16-03-2016

¶37

3 /3

¶38

for the appellant in respect of the assessment years in question. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of four years and eleven months in filing of the first appeal.

¶39

Consequently, the order dated 09^th of June, 2011 passed by the appellate authority i.e. Learned J.C.C.T.(A), Central Division, Patna in Appeal Case No. ST/SL-86/201011 and ST/SL-87/2010-11 for the period 2003-04 and 2004-05 and the order dated 25^th of August, 2014 passed by Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, Patna are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeal) for decision in accordance with law.

¶40

The appeals are, thus, allowed.

¶41

(Hemant Gupta, J)

¶42

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)

¶43

P.K.P.

¶44

M/s Acc Ltd, Patna v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Acc Ltd, Patna v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjana Kumari Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Bimal Chandra Sadhya Vs State and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs State and Ors.

South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

P S R Highway Carriers Of India Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.