Dismissed
Sanjya Kumar Raju v. Anushree Rashmi
Patna HCMA/492/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
| Miscellaneous Appeal No.492 of 2014 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Sanjya Kumar Raju .... .... Appellant Versus Anushree Rashmi .... .... Respondent ====================================================== |
|
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) |
|
| 4 | 10-05-2016 No one appears for the appellant even today. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. |
| It is pointed out by the stamp reporter that the appeal has been filed against an interlocutory order rejecting the petition filed against the maintainability of the proceedings before the Family Court. In the aforesaid circumstances, in view of the provisions of Section 19 of the Family Court Act, the appeal against such order is not maintainable. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable. |
|
| (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) | |
| U.K./ | B.Kr./- (Sudhir Singh, J) |
| U |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeal against an interlocutory order rejecting family court petition on maintainability is maintainable?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjya Kumar Raju
Anushree Rashmi
RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court