Disposed
Md. Akil Ahmad v. Bibi Fauzia Ishrat
Patna HCMA/349/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
| Miscellaneous Appeal No.349 of 2016 |
|---|
| ====================================================== Md. Akil Ahmad .... .... Appellant Versus Bibi Fauzia .... .... Respondent ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) |
| 2 09-05-2016 Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the |
| appellant, seeks permission to convert the present Miscellaneous Appeal into an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. He is permitted to do so. Let the necessary corrections be made within a period of one week from today. |
| (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) |
| (Sudhir Singh, J) |
| U.K./-B.Kr. U |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Akil Ahmad
Bibi Fauzia
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court