Sadanand Jha v. Subi Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn by the appellant with liberty to apply for setting aside the ex parte judgment. The order explicitly stated no opinion was formed on the merits.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for setting aside the ex parte judgment.
What the court decided
Patna High Court MA No.119 of 2013 (8) dt.17-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.119 of 2013
====================================================== Sadanand Jha, son of Mahendra Jha, resident of village-Orief, P.S. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus Subi Devi, D/O Sri Anil Choudhary, resident of village-Golhati, P.S. Bounsi, District- Banka .... .... Respondent/s For the Appellant: Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta Mr. Deepak Kumar Rajiv Ranjan For the Respondent:====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) 8 17-03-2016 Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file an application for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. However, the grant of permission to withdraw the present appeal shall not be considered as any expression on the merits of the case. As and when any application is filed by the appellant, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. (Hemant Gupta, J) V.P.Sinha/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) U
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sadanand Jha
- respondent
Subi Devi
Coram
Hemant Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court