In First Appeal No.69 of 2011, the Patna High Court permitted the appellants to withdraw the appeal after they submitted that a compromise was reached outside court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.69 of 2011
====================================================== Vijay Mahton & Ors .... .... Appellant/s Versus Shakuntala Devi & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 7 23-08-2016 By filing mentioning slip this appeal has been put up. It is submitted on behalf of the appellants that the parties have compromised the case outside the court hence the appellants may be permitted to withdraw this appeal. Sri Ranjan Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the appellants, is present and he submits that under the changed circumstances the appellants do not want to continue with this appeal and hence permission has been sought to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, the appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal. In the result, this First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/-
U
Vijay Mahton & Ors
Shakuntala Devi & Ors
Jitendra Mohan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
