Allowed

Sushil Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2016CR. MISC./19738/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail petition was allowed where the petitioner was in custody since November 2014 regarding a fatal incident. The High Court accepted statements indicating the petitioner was not the primary assailant and directed his release on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions including presence at trial.

Sushil Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19738 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2014 Thana -GHOGHARDIHA District- MADHUBANI

¶3

====================================================== Sushil Sah, Son of Baidhyanathi Sah, R/o vill. - Kishanipatti, P.S. Ghodhardiha, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Kant Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr.Pandey(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 3 24-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

¶4

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 23.11.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35453 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2014. Fardbeyan of Jitendra Kumar Yadav, the brother of the deceased has been recorded in para 29 of the case diary wherein he has specifically stated that on the order of Dukhi Sah, Santosh Sah gave knife blow repeatedly, causing injury on the chest of Harinandan Yadav and thereafter he died. Further accused Santosh Sah in his statement in para 38 of the case diary has also admitted that he has given knife blow on Harinandan Yadav and as such, the petitioner deserves

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19738 of 2016 (3) dt.24-08-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

sympathetic consideration as he is not the assailant. Fardbeyan of Shyam Sundar Yadav appears not reliable.

¶8

Learned APP submits that as per the fardbeyan of Jitendra Yadav brother of the deceased and further as per statement of co-accused Santosh Sah, the petitioner is not the assailant, but in First Information Report lodged by Shyam Sundar Yadav, he has been also alleged as one of the assailant.

¶9

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the aforesaid materials now the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur (Madhubani) arising out of Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No. 80 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

¶10

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.)

¶11

Rajiv/-

¶12

Sushil Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Mahton and Ors. Vs Shakuntala Devi and Ors.

Chandra Shekhar Kr. Chauhan and Vs Naresh Pd. @ Bishundeo Chauhan

Banita Devi and Ors. Vs the Reliance General Insurance

Shila Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Belash Ram and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar