Oral order dismissing a writ application for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls on 02-02-2016.
Writ application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9361 of 2012
======================================================
Nathuni Pandit & Anr
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Bajrangi Sah & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR
MANDAL
ORAL ORDER
3 02-02-2016 Despite repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the
petitioner to press this writ application. The same is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
HR/-
U
Nathuni Pandit & Anr.
Bajrangi Sah & Ors.
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
