Dismissed

Sonu Mian @ Mohammad Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Feb 2016CR. MISC./53427/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a case involving assault and cheating. The court held that the allegations against the petitioner were grave enough to deny privilege and ordered him to surrender and seek bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender and seek bail.

Sonu Mian @ Mohammad Sonu Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53427 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2014 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Sonu Mian @ Mohammad Sonu son of Naim Mian, Resident of villagePaithan Tola, P.S.- Bhorey, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kr.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER

¶4

3 01-02-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶5

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bhorey P.S. Case No. 194 of 2014 registered under sections 341,323,324,307,354 and 504/34 IPC and seeks anticipatory bail.

¶6

As per the FIR, on account of removal of a hut, it is alleged, the accused persons started assaulting the prosecution side in which the mother of the petitioner and others received injury. Further allegation is that the petitioner hit Tangi blows three times on the head of the informant.

¶7

The contention of the petitioner is that there is a counter version also alleged by the mother in which the mother received injury on her head. It is submitted that although the doctor found three injuries on the head of the informant caused by sharp-cutting

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53427 of 2015 (3) dt.01-02-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

weapon, but they were not found grievous in nature.

¶11

Learned APP opposed the prayer and contended that specific allegation of causing injury by means of Tangi on the head of the informant is attributed to the petitioner.

¶12

Considering the submissions of the parties and on perusal of materials on record including the impugned order, I am not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer is rejected. He should surrender and seek bail.

¶13

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶14

HR/-

¶15

U T

Sonu Mian @ Mohammad Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Mian @ Mohammad Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdeo Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Most. Binda Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Dhirendra Kumar Das Arvind Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Premlata Devi @ Savitri Devi Vs The Bihar Vidhan Sabha and Ors.

Nikhat Praween Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar