Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Ojha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC29 Jan 2016CWJC/8934/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an appointment advertisement on the ground that employment in another State is not a valid challenge. The Court noted earlier orders support its view and held the petitioner was misled.

What did the court decide?

Writ application dismissed on the ground that employment in another State is not a valid basis to challenge the appointment advertisement.

Pawan Kumar Ojha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8934 of 2015

¶3

=========================================================== Pawan Kumar Ojha, son of Sri Kanhaiya Lal Ojha, resident of Flat No. 108/B, Hope Narayani Apartment, Vijay Nagar, Rukunpura, P.S. Rupaspur, P.S. Rupaspur, District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Agriculture Production Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Director, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Patna.

¶11

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent State : Mr. AJAY- GA12 For the Staff Selection

¶15

Commission : Mr. K. K. Upadhyay

¶16

Mr. C. B. Das

¶17

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT

¶18

Date: 29-01-2016

¶19

Writ application is dismissed for the sole reason that any candidate working in another State, may be with similar kind of department cannot become a ground for challenge to the advertisement for appointment on a post in the State of Bihar.

¶20

The Court is of the opinion that deliberately the Court was sought to be misled on certain factual aspect of the matter.

¶21

Even otherwise, this Court has dealt with such

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.8934 of 2015 dt.29-01-2016

¶23

¶24

matters earlier and those orders passed in this regard are part of counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents. The rationale and reasoning given therein also applies to the present case.

¶25

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/-

¶26

Pawan Kumar Ojha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar Ojha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Sinha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Moti Lal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amrendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Managing Committee Of Banke Bihari Sanskrit High School and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Lakshmi Narayan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.