Budheshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order by one judge permitting the petitioner to raise their grievance before the District Magistrate regarding the construction of a Mahadalit Community Hall, noting the Writ Court will not simply implement authority orders without legal rights shown.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to raise grievance before the District Magistrate for consideration expeditiously.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6301 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Budheshwar Ram Son Of Late Gopi Ram Resident Of Village Rampur P.O. Ram Chandra Nagar P.S. Jamhor Block And District Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission, Chief Ministerial Secretariat, Desh Ratan Marg, Patna 3. State Project Officer, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission, Bihar, Patna 4. District Magistrate (D.M.) Aurangabad 5. District Welfare Officer, Aurangabad 6. Block Development Officer (B.D.O.) Aurangabad 7. Circle Officer (C.O.) Aurangabad 8. Block Welfare Officer, Aurangabad 9. Puspa Kumari, Vikash Mitra Gram Panchayat Karmabag Village Rampur P.S. Ram Chandra Nagar P.S. Jamhor District Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 4 21-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Representing the cause of the people, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for an order commanding the respondents to construct Mahadalit Community Hall-cum- Work Shed in village Rampur Gram Panchayat Kama Bhagwan Block Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. The Writ Court would not simply implement the order of the authority unless certain legal right is shown by the petitioner. The respondents have urged that the allotment of fund
Patna High Court CWJC No.6301 of 2013 (4) dt.21-01-2016
2/2
was for the year 2011-12.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall agitate the matter before the concerned respondents particularly before the District Magistrate of the district.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has a legal right to compel construction of a Mahadalit Community Hall-cum-Work Shed.
Whether the petitioner can be directed to construct the hall using funds allotted for the year 2011-12 at a specific location.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to raise the grievance before the District Magistrate for expeditious consideration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Budheshwar Ram Son Of Late Gopi Ram
- respondent
The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary
- respondent
Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission
- respondent
State Project Officer, Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission
- respondent
District Magistrate, Aurangabad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court