Disposed

Shanti Devi Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Nov 2016CWJC/4363/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed miscalculation in post-retirement benefits already paid. Court dismissed writ petition as admitted dues were settled, granting liberty to raise calculation errors before relief officer within specified timelines.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to raise grievance on calculation errors before Respondent No. 6 within four weeks; Respondent directed to dispose within two months.

Shanti Devi Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4363 of 2014

¶3

=========================================================== Shanti Devi Jha, wife of late Lalit Narayan Jha, resident of near Women College, Sipahi Tola, Purnea, P.S. Khazanchi Hatt, District - Purnea, the retired reader, Department of Political Science, Women's College, Purnea

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura through the Vice Chancellor

¶7

1. The Vice - Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura 6. The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura 7. The Finance Officer, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura 8. The Principal, Women's College, Purnea

¶8

.... .... Respondents

¶9

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, A.A.G. - 7

¶11

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Date: 17-11-2016

¶13

At the outset, it is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has been paid his post retirement benefits under the Heads Gratuity, Leave Enchashment, Group Insurance, General Provident Fund and arrears of Pension. However, it is contended that there appears to be some miscalculation in the computation made by the respondent authorities.

¶14

In view of the fact that the admitted dues of the petitioner has already been paid, this application is disposed of with

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.4363 of 2014 dt.17-11-2016

¶16

2/2

¶17

liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance relating to any error in calculation before the Respondent No. 6 within four weeks from today. In case, such a representation is filed, the Respondent No. 6 is directed to look into the matter and dispose of the same within a period of two months thereafter by a reasoned order.

¶18

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

S.Ali/-

¶20

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A. Uploading Date 19/11/2016 Transmission Date

Shanti Devi Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanti Devi Jha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandradeo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Uma Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Govind Das Vs The Patna Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shailendra Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Chandra Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.