Disposed

Vijay Chandra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Nov 2016CWJC/22292/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ jurisdiction case concerning pension, the petitioner complained of illegal monetary recovery from his pension. The High Court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to file a separate writ specifically challenging the order directing the deduction.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order by which deduction has been made from his pension by filing an appropriate writ application.

Vijay Chandra Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22292 of 2013

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Vijay Chandra Thakur S/O Late Baldeo Thakur Resident Of Village & Post - Jajuar, P.S. - Katra, Dist. - Muzaffarpur

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶6

The Principle Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Engineer in Chief (Middle), Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Superintending Engineer, Eastern Sone High Level Canal Circle Aurangabad

¶8

The Executive Engineer, Eastern Sone High Level Canal, Division - Tekari (Gaya) 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer cum Asstt. Engineer Eastern Sone High Level Canal Subdivision - Goh (2) Aurangabad

¶9

The Assistant Engineer, Sone High Canal Sub-Division - Dadar, Aurangabad

¶10

The District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Prasad Singh No-2, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, A.C. to SC-27

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-11-2016

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

counsel for the State.

¶17

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that so far as Gratuity, Earned Leave, G.P.F. and Group Life Insurance are concerned, they have already been paid to the petitioner. But, while making payment of Pension, an illegal recovery of Rs.2,00,739/- has been made by the Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.22292 of 2013 dt.17-11-2016

¶19

2/2

¶20

in compliance with an order passed by the Executive Engineer, Eastern Sone High Level Canal Division, Tekari, Gaya.

¶21

In view of the submission made at the Bar, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order by which deduction has been made from the pension of the petitioner by filing an appropriate writ application.

¶22

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Pradeep/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	----
UploadingDate	18-11-2016
Transmission Date	18-11-2016

Vijay Chandra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Chandra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandradeo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Uma Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Govind Das Vs The Patna Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shailendra Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shanti Devi Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.