Petitioner in a PIL filed under Article 226 sought withdrawal with liberty to approach authorities. Respondents raised no objection. Court disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Writ application disposed of as withdrawn; liberty granted to petitioner to approach appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.495 of 2015
| ====================================================== Dhirendra Kumar Son of Sri Suresh Prasad Singh Resident of- Chanakyapuri Colony, Gaya, Police Station-Rampur in the district of Gaya. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 6. The Civil Surgeon, Aurangabad. 7. Dr. Parshuram Bharti, at present posted as Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad. Son of not known to the petitioner .... .... Respondents ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) |
|
| 2 | 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Counsel for the |
| petitioner, and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Principal Additional | |
| Advocate General, appearing for the State respondents. | |
| After some arguments, Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned | |
| Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this | |
| application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach |
|
| the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so | |
| advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may |
Patna High Court CWJC No.495 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016
2/2
be permissible.
No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ)
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
Pawan/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhirendra Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary
The Chief Secretary
The Principal Secretary
The Divisional Commissioner
Dr. Parshuram Bharti
Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
