This bench dismissed two connected writ petitions challenging termination of the petitioner's teacher services and alleged forgery of her mark sheet. The court held the grievances involved serious disputed issues of fact and declined to interfere at the admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2450 of 2012
===========================================================
Rekha Kumari, aged about 35 years, W/O Dinesh Singh, Resident Of Village - Baruna, P.O. Chipura Khurd, P.S. Gauarichak, District Patna
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
With
=========================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18378 of 2011 ===========================================================
Rekha Kumari , aged about 34 years, Wife of Dinesh Singh, Resident Of VillageBaruna, P.O.- Chipura Khurd, P.S. - Gaurichak, District-Patna
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
===========================================================
Appearance : (In CWJC No.2450 of 2012) For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Dr. Anil Kr Uapdhyay SC 2 For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Ranjit Sinha, Advocate
(In CWJC No.18378 of 2011) For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
Patna High Court CWJC No.2450 of 2012 dt.19-12-2016
2/5
For the Respondents : Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, AC to AAG 4 For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Ranjit Sinha, Advocate
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-12-2016
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the respondents.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2450 of 2012 dt.19-12-2016
3/5
disposal at the admission stage itself with consent of the parties.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2450 of 2012 dt.19-12-2016
4/5
appointment. It is submitted that the findings of the Board as well as of the Appellate Authority are wrong and baseless.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2450 of 2012 dt.19-12-2016
5/5
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAVDATE | N.A. |
| UploadingDate | 23.12.2016 |
| Transmission Date |
N.A. |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned orders terminating the petitioner's services and directing recovery of salary.
Whether the findings regarding the forgery and interpolation of the petitioner's mark sheet are established facts warranting judicial intervention at the admission stage.
Rekha Kumari
The State Of Bihar
The Member, District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal
The District Magistrate, Patna
The District Superintendent of Education, Patna
Neeta Kumari
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
