Allowed

Hasmuddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC16 Dec 2016CR. MISC./52565/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition arising from a prosecution for violating the Bihar Excise Act and IPC offences, the Court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties with conditions regarding presence in court and non-reoffending.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions of close relative surety, no similar offence, and physical presence in court.

Hasmuddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52565 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2016 Thana -KUNDWACHAINPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hasmuddin S/o Md. Salauddin Village - Murai P.S. Dhaka (O.P. - Panchpakari), District - East Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Sub Inspector Azad Gautam S.S.B. 602/1791, Baijariya Road Dubga, P.O. + P.S. Kakori, District Lucknow (U.P.) at present C - Samway Company Sasastra Sima Bal Kundwa Chainpur, P.O. + P.S. Kundwa Chainpur District - East Champaran.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance:

¶11

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 16-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody since 07.09.2016 in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 80 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) and 54 of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶16

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to party politics. The petitioner denies the recovery of the offending goods from his conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶17

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sikarahana, District East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 80 of 2016 on the following conditions -

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52565 of 2016 (2) dt.16-12-2016

¶19

2/2

¶20

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶23

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶24

Chandran/BT

¶25

U T

Hasmuddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasmuddin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagat Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Bharat Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Jaiswal Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pano Devi Vs The State Of Bihar