No one appeared for the petitioner. The writ application for directing the Deputy Collector to decide a pending land reforms case was dismissed as infructuous due to lack of appearance and no updated status of the underlying case.
The writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24058 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Mahendra Tanti S/O Late Jholi Tanti Resident Of Village - Rasalpur, P.S. Biroul, Distt. - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Collector, Darbhanga 2. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Biroul, Darbhanga 3. Circle Officer, Biroul, Distt. Darbhanga 4. Lootan Kamati S/O Yoji Kamati Resident Of Village - Rasalpur, P.S. Biroul, Distt. - Darbhanga 5. Bachcha Sharma S/O Bale Sharma Resident Of Village - Rasalpur, P.S. Biroul, Distt. - Darbhanga 6. Baleshwar Sharma S/O Bale Sharma Resident Of Village - Rasalpur, P.S. Biroul, Distt. - Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 15-07-2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The same is the case with the respondents-State. The writ application was filed in 2013 for directing the respondent-Deputy Collector Land Reforms to decide the pending case No. 183/11-12. The non-appearance of the counsel for the petitioner exhibits that the writ application has become infructuous. In the meanwhile, the respondents-DCLR might have decided the case of the petitioner. There is no supplementary affidavit stating the current status of the said case. Seen thus, the writ application is dismissed as having
Patna High Court CWJC No.24058 of 2013 (2) dt.15-07-2016
2/2
become infructuous.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
rohit/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application should be maintained when the petitioner has not appeared and no update on the pending case is provided.
MAHENDRA TANTI
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, DARBHANGA
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, BIROUL, DARBHANGA
CIRCLE OFFICER, BIROUL, DISTT. DARBHANGA
LOOTAN KAMATI
BACHCHA SHARMA
KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
