The court found the writ petition infructuous as the respondents offered to accept a fresh application. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
The writ application was dismissed as it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.23851 of 2013 (2) dt.18-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23851 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Kanishk Sinha Son Of Si Bimal Bihari Sinha Resident Of C/O Smt Chaitali Sinha, R/O 98 Munder Sah Khajpura Akashwani Road, P.O. - B.V. College, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800014, District - Patna Sadar, Bihar
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Mandal,SC-24 For the respondent no.1 : Ms. Kanka Verma CGC. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
2 18-07-2016 No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Heard.
The Counsel for the Union of India placed the communication dated 26.6.2013 (Annexure-8) which is impugned in the writ petition and submits that if the forms and fees have been returned treating the application as abandoned the writ petitioner can file afresh application. In her submission, the writ application has become infructuous.
I, accordingly, dismiss the writ application as having become infructuous.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/U
Kanishk Sinha
Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trademarks
The State Of Bihar
KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
