Petitioners sought directions for their appointment/absorption against casual posts in nonformal education. The court disposed of the petition relying on assurances from the State to expedite the process and by reference to a similar earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23091 of 2011
===========================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
===========================================================
Appearance:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.N. Sahi, AAG14
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 21-12-2016
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel
for the respondents.
Patna High Court CWJC No.23091 of 2011 dt.21-12-2016
2
as Instructor under Jagdishpur Programme from 1994 to 31.03.2001.
“Having heard Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, this writ application is disposed of with the observation that the claim of the petitioner would be governed by the decision which may be taken by the State Government in light of the direction which has been rendered in CWJC No. 8418 of 2010 (Sheo Bhajan Prasad Diwakar and others vs. State of Bihar and others) and other analogous cases decided on 21.04.2011. ”
Patna High Court CWJC No.23091 of 2011 dt.21-12-2016
3
already been commenced by the State and is underway.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/BT
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
23.12.2016 |
| Transmission Date |
N.A. |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking appointment or absorption of petitioners as instructors should be allowed in light of the disposal of a similar writ petition.
Whether the assurances provided by the State counsel to expedite the appointment process constitute a disposition of the matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CWJC No. 864 of 2011Referred¶3
Sheo Bhajan Prasad Diwakar and others vs. State of Bihar and othersReferred¶3
CWJC No. 8418 of 2010 (Sheo Bhajan Prasad Diwakar and others vs. State of Bihar and others)
LPA No. 1489 of 2011 (The State of Bihar and others vs. Sheo Bhajan Prasad Diwakar and others)Referred¶4
SLP (C) No. 32079 of 2015Referred¶4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md.Hussian Ahmad and others
State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Bhagalpur
District Mass Education Officer, Bhagalpur
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna
The Director Mass Education Directorate, Bihar, Patna
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
