In a writ petition, the High Court orally modified a dated 13.07.2016 order to stipulate that the word 'acquisition' be read in place of 'award' at a specific paragraph location.
The order dated 13.07.2016 was modified to read 'award/acquisition' instead of 'award' in the third line of paragraph 2 at page 01.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20401 of 2013
| ====================================================== Sheela Devi & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Archana Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishiraj Sinha |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER |
|
| 5 | 20-07-2016 The matter has been listed at the instance of the |
| petitioners for effecting correction/modification in the order dated 13.07.2016. |
|
| It is submitted that in the 3rd line of paragraph 2 at page 1 of the said order, the acquisition word should also be added. Having heard the parties, the order dated 13.07.2016 is modified to the extent that in the 3rdline of paragraph 2 at page 01 |
|
| of the order, in place of award, it should be read as | |
| award/acquisition. |
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
HR/-
U
Sheela Devi & Ors
The State of Bihar & Ors
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
