, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of manufacturing and selling illicit liquor, noting the petitioner's escape after a raid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26033 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2016 Thana -PIRI BAZAR District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== 1. Bharat Kumar Singh, Son of Late Chunnilal Singh, Resident of VillageGhosaith, P.S.- Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
2 12-07-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. case No. 41 of 2016 registered under Sections 272,273 and 290 of the IPC and Sections 47(a)/52/53(a)(c) of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act.
On confidential information, the ‘Bhunja’ shop of the petitioner was raided by the police. Seeing the raiding team, it is alleged, the petitioner escaped. A search was carried out. Behind the shop of the petitioner, in a kachara bag few bottles of India made foreign liquor (IMFL) was found.
Contention of the petitioner is that the seizure, if any of the IMFL, was not from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The seizure memo does not contain his signature or the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26033 of 2016 (2) dt.12-07-2016
2/2
signature of even any independent witness.
Learned APP opposed the prayer and submitted that the petitioner was running the shop and after seeing the raiding team had escaped therefrom. Just behind the shop of the petitioner the recoveries were made.
On looking to the allegations and the other materials reflected from the record including the impugned order, I am not persuaded to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. Prayer is rejected.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case concerning possession of illicit liquor under the Bihar Excise Amendment Act.
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Bharat Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
