The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed a writ petition by order of oral adjournment because the petitioner failed to appear on behalf of the case despite prior notice on the daily cause list, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19899 of 2013
====================================================== Afzal Ashraf, son of Azhar Hussain, resident of village-Bastha, P.S.Mainatand, District-West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Collector, West Champaran. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Narkatiyaganj, District-West Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aditya Nath Jha, AC to SC-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 5 08-09-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf is printed in the daily cause list. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/U
Afzal Ashraf
The State of Bihar
Collector, West Champaran
Sub Divisional Officer, Narkatiyaganj
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
