Disposed

Nita Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC7 Sept 2016MJC/3496/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition concerning her service dispute instead of restoring the original dismissed petition, requiring her to bring subsequent developments on record within two months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition within two months regarding the subject matter, bringing subsequent developments on record.

Nita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3496 of 2014

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1084 of 2014

¶4

====================================================== Nita Devi, w/o Satya Narayan Yadav, resident of village - Ahra, Kushumjori Gram Panchayat Chandan, District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. District Magistrate, Banka, P.O. and P.S. Banka, District Banka 3. District Programme Officer, Banka, P.O. and P.S. Banka, Distt. Banka 4. Child Development Project Officer, Chandan, Banka, P.O. and P.S. Banka, District - Banka

¶5

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 07-09-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, none appears on behalf of the opposite parties, though the name of the learned State counsel is printed in the daily cause list. The original writ petitioner has filed the present MJC application seeking restoration of CWJC No.1084 of 2014, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution by an order dated 11.08.2014. The dispute relates with respect to the engagement/termination on the post of Anganwari Sevika. The aforesaid writ petition was filed way back on 13.01.2014 and since then more than two and half years have already elapsed, but all the subsequent developments, which might have taken place during the interregnum period, have not been brought on record.

¶6

In above view of the matter, this Court is of the

¶7

Patna High Court MJC No.3496 of 2014 (4) dt.07-09-2016

¶8

¶9

opinion that, instead of restoring the aforesaid CWJC No. 1084 of 2014 to its original file, the interest of justice shall be sub-served, if the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition in the same subject matter, after bringing on record all the subsequent developments, which might have taken place during the interregnum period. It is ordered accordingly.

¶10

If such a fresh writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner within a period of two months from today with a certified copy of the present order, then the same shall be decided on its own merits, without being prejudiced/influenced by the order dated 11.08.2014, whereby CWJC No. 1084 of 2014 was dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶11

The present MJC application stands finally disposed of with the observations and directions made above.

¶12

Arvind/-

¶13

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶14

Nita Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nita Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipin Bihari Dubey 7 Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kapildeo Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Most. Motiraj Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhagawan Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Mehjabi Naz and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rauf Mian Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.