Dismissed

Sujeet Tiwary and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Nov 2016CWJC/18445/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition challenging an order directing two petitioner officers to report and join at Jharkhand. The court held that the order was a natural corollary to a previous decree and Central Government policy, thus refusing interference.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed without any further relief being granted.

Sujeet Tiwary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18445 of 2016

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Sujeet Tiwary son of Late Krishna Kumar Tiwary, resident of MohallaBhagirathi Lane, Mahendru, Police Station- Sultanganj, District- Patna. 2. Rajiva Ranjan Gupta son of Raghubir Singh, resident of Raghubir Sadan, Mohalla- Chandmari, P.S.- Motihari, District- Motihari.

¶4

.... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

Deputy Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Chief of Controller of Audit (Account), Secretariat, Patna.

¶6

The Controller of Accounts, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Deputy Controller of Accounts, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner, Finance Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 8. Union of India through the Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, Government of India, New Delhi. 9. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶7

.... .... Respondents

¶8

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, Senior Advocate State of Jharkhand Mr. Nazir Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT

¶9

Date: 19-11-2016

¶10

Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior

¶11

Counsel for the respondent State of Jharkhand.

¶12

Annexure-5 is dated 17.10.2016 by virtue of which the

¶13

two petitioners have been asked to report and join at Jharkhand their allotted cadre.

¶14

This issue was earlier raised by the petitioners in a previous writ application. The Court had very clearly and

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.18445 of 2016 dt.19-11-2016

¶16

2/2

¶17

categorically negated their prayer by virtue of Annexure-3 dated 23.04.2015.

¶18

Annexure-5, the order impugned, is the natural corollary to Annexure-3 as well as a policy of the Central Government with regard to the cadre transfer between two States.

¶19

No interference is, therefore, warranted with Annexure-

¶20

Writ stands dismissed.

¶21

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶22

Pawan/-

¶23

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	N/A
UploadingDate	19.11.2016
Transmission Date	N/A

Sujeet Tiwary and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujeet Tiwary and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Committee Of Madarsa Darul Takmil Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pankaj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Niran Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Seema Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hari Shankar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manju Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.