A thin writ petition was disposed of without taking the case on merits. The bench advised petitioners to approach the competent authority. No substantive order was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9437 of 2014
=========================================================== 1. Niran Kumar son of Sri Mohan Prasad, resident of village- Harinagar, P.S.Gogri, P.O.- Mahesh Khut, District- Khagaria
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
===========================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. ABBAS HAIDER, SC-6
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 18-11-2016
The petitioners will be well advised to approach the
concerned competent authority with regard to the grievance. There are many a reasons the Court will not take up the case and pass any
Patna High Court CWJC No.9437 of 2014 dt.18-11-2016
2/2
decisive order at this stage. If such an application is filed, after giving the opportunity of hearing and verifying the records, an speaking order will be passed within a period of five months thereafter.
Writ is disposed of.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Pawan/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAVDATE | N/A |
| UploadingDate | 18.11.2016 |
| Transmission Date |
N/A |
Niran Kumar
Ajit Kumar
Ranjeet Kumar
Ashok Kumar Prasad
Sudhir Kumar Prasad
Yogendra Kumar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
