Dismissed
Dinesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/17336/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CWJC No.17336 of 2016 (2) dt.19-12-2016 IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17336 of 2016 (2) dt.19-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17336 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naseem Mukhtar, Advopcate For the State : Mr. Chhotelal Mishra, AC to GA-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
the petitioner is completely covered by the order passed in L.P.A No.989 of 2013 (Rajendra Singh v. The State of Bihar & others).
In such view of the matter, the authority concerned is directed to examine the case of the petitioner and if the case of the petitioner is identical, the authority will give the same benefit as has been given to him.
With the aforesaid observation this writ petition is disposed of.
Vinay/-
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajendra Singh v. The State of Bihar & othersFollowed¶13
L.P.A No.989 of 2013 (Rajendra Singh v. The State of Bihar & others)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
District Development Commissioner Rohtas
District Development Commissioner Rohtas
SHIVAJI PANDEY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court