Dismissed
Sk. Samid @ S.k. Samid Rahman v. Md. Shamim and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/14395/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This writ petition under Article 227 challenged the appellate court's rejection of an offer to adduce additional evidence. The Court held that since the petitioner possessed the document and failed to explain lack of due diligence, the lower court correctly applied the proviso to Order 41 Rule 27 (aa) CPC. The application was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition questioning the rejection of additional evidence was dismissed as the lower court had correctly applied the law regarding due diligence.