Petitioners withdrew the writ application with liberty to seek redressal according to law; order allowed withdrawal and dismissed application.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11280 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dharmendra Choubey, Adv. Mr. Vijay Shankar Upadhayay, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 7 01-12-2016 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioners to seek redressal of their grievances in accordance with law.
The prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(V. Nath, J)
Devendra/-
U
Dashrath Prasad
Krishna Kumar
The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate
Manju Devi
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
