High Court oral order dismissing a civil writ application for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was called on 08-01-2016.
Writ application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13241 of 2013
====================================================== Yamuna Singh Son Of Shiv Pujan Singh Resident Of Village- Satuahi, P.S. Jamhore, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Aurangabad 3. The Anchal Adhikari, Barun, Aurangabad 4. Umesh Pandey Son Of Manibansh Pandey, Resident Of Satuahi, P.S. Jamhore, District- Aurangabad .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Avinash Kumar, AC to GA 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 3 08-01-2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application when the case is called out. It appears that on the last occasion also when the matter was taken up none was present on behalf of the petitioner. As a result, this writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
Spd/-
U
Yamuna Singh Son Of Shiv Pujan Singh
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Aurangabad
The Anchal Adhikari, Barun, Aurangabad
Umesh Pandey Son Of Manibansh Pandey
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
