Allowed

Chand Babu @ Runna Mian v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jan 2016CR. MISC./1076/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving Section 379 IPC, releasing him on a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties under Section 438 CrPC, with conditions regarding relationship verification and cancellation if involved in similar offenses.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Chand Babu @ Runna Mian Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1076 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2013 Thana -GOPALGANJ NAGAR District- GOPALGANJ

¶4

====================================================== Chand Babu @ Runna Mian, S/O Late Adam Hussain, Resident of villageTakia-Banket, P.S. Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 11-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶6

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the FIR was lodged against unknown, however, the petitioner’s name has cropped up in view of the self incriminating confessional statement of the co-accused Saddam Ali. The petitioner claims that he has got clean antecedent.

¶8

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶9

let the petitioner, namely, Chand Babu @ Runna Mian be released on bail in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1076 of 2016 (2) dt.11-01-2016

¶11

2/2

¶12

connection with Gopalganj (Nagar) P.S. Case No.36/2013, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section(2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a further condition that one of the bailors must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his/her relationship with him.

¶13

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶14

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)

¶15

V.K. Pandey/-

¶16

U T

Chand Babu @ Runna Mian v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chand Babu @ Runna Mian v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramlaw Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Yamuna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shankar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sachidanand Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vineet Mishra Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Devendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.