In this oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed the writ petition due to non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the specified date to press the petition or seek adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11347 of 2011
======================================================
Jishnu Dutta Mishra
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General 2
Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3. 14-01-2016 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioner either
to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned
A.C. to Addl. Advocate General – 2 as well as Sri Chandra Mohan
Singh, learned counsel for the respondent/L.N.Mithila University
are present.
The writ petition stands dismissed due to non-
prosecution.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
U
Jishnu Dutta Mishra
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
