The writ petition was dismissed on account of non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioners on the dates of hearing. No substantive legal proposition was laid down in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10857 of 2011
| ====================================================== Surendra Tiwari, son of Sri Umesh Tiwari & Anr .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghib Ahsan(Asst.Sg) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 8 |
13-01-2016 Today again on call, none appeared on behalf of the |
| petitioners either to press this petition or to make a prayer for | |
| adjournment. On the last date also, there was non-appearance on | |
| behalf of the petitioners. Sri Prabhakar Tekriwal, learned counsel, | |
| who appears on behalf of Respondent nos.2 and 3/ Food | |
| Corporation of India, is present. | |
| The writ petition stands dismissed due to non- | |
| prosecution. | |
| (Rakesh Kumar, J) | |
| NKS/- U |
Surendra Tiwari
Union of India
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
