The petitioner's counsel stated he could not obtain instructions from his client, who therefore did not want to pursue the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22047 of 2013
====================================================== Bhubneshwar Sharma S/O Late Biranchi Sharma, C/O Ranjan Saw Mill R/O Mohalla- Marufchak, P.O. Mirzanhat, P.S. Mirzanhat, DistrictBhagalpur .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (FFR Division), Govt. of India, 1st Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhi110003 2. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home (Special), Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (FFR) Division, Government of India, 1st Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhi- 110003 4. The Union Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (FFR) Division Government of India, 1st Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhi- 110003 5. The Secretary, Department of Home(Special), Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna 6. The Joint Secretary, Department of Home(Special), Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna 7. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department Of Home(Special), Ranchi 8. The District Magistrate, Banka 9. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 10. The Sub Divisional Officer, Banka, District- Banka .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kripa Nand Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 12-01-2016 Sri Kripa Nand Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to GP-27, Sri N.N.Ojha, learned counsel for the Respondent/ State of Jharkhand as well as Sri Awadhesh Kr. Pandey, learned Senior Panel Counsel of Govt. of India, who was assisted by Sri R.K.Sharma, submits that despite his best efforts , he is not able to get instruction. Accordingly, he
Patna High Court CWJC No.22047 of 2013 (4) dt.12-01-2016
2/2
does not want to press this writ petition.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
NKS/-
U
Bhubneshwar Sharma
The Union of India
The State of Bihar
The State of Jharkhand
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
