The petitioner sought review of an earlier direction to unlock business premises. The court held the application infructuous as no prejudicial order had been passed since then and dismissed it.
The application filed by the petitioner was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10307 of 2013
======================================================
Mr. Thakur, Counsel for the petitioner, referring to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.10307 of 2013 (5) dt.11-02-2016
2/2
order dated 4.6.2013 whereby this Court directed for unlocking the business premises of the petitioner, rightly submits that the application has now become infructuous as no order prejudicial to the petitioner has, till date, been passed.
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/U
Chakra Infrastructure Limited
The State Of Bihar
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
