In this writ petition filed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9147 of 2013, the High Court at Patna dismissed the application for want of prosecution since no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9147 of 2013
====================================================== Sarita Sinha Wife Of Vivekanand Sinha Resident Of Mohalla Meharpar, P.S. Laheri, District Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union Of India Through The Registrar, Companies Department, New Delhi 2. The Director, Siya Ram Development And Construction Company 103, Central Park, Jodarper Kolkatta - 7000032 3. The Chairman, Siya Ram Development And Construction Company 103, Central Park, Jodarper, Kolkatta, - 7000032 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Union of India : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 3 10-02-2016 Despite repeated calls, no body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the Union of India is however present. The writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
HR/-
U
Sarita Sinha
The Union Of India
The Director, Siya Ram Development And Construction Company
The Chairman, Siya Ram Development And Construction Company
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
