Sevak Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/10140/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Hearing a writ petition, the Court disposed of the matter by permitting the petitioner to pursue the remedy already filed before the appropriate authority, specifically the District Magistrate, in accordance with law.
What did the court decide?
Permitted the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority, including the representation filed before the District Magistrate.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
¶2
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10140 of 2013
¶3
- ====================================================== 1. Sevak Yadav Son Of Late Lilo Yadav Resident Of Village - Brindawan Kiul Dharamshala, P.S. Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai
¶4
- Shailendra Yadav Son Of Late Yaddu Yadav Resident Of Village - Brindawan Kiul Dharamshala, P.S. Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai
¶5
- Birendra Yadav @ Devandra Yadav Son Of Late Brahmdeo Yadav Resident Of Village - Brindawan Kiul Dharamshala, P.S. Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai
¶6
- Manohar Gupta @ Manohar Pd. Gupta Son Of Late Paras Gupta Resident Of Mohalla - Kiul Dharamshala, P.S. Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai
¶7
- .... .... Petitioner/s
¶8
- Versus
¶9
- The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Lakhisarai 2. The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi
¶10
- The General Manager Eastern Railway Howrah, Kolkata
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sevak Yadav
- petitioner
Shailendra Yadav
- petitioner
Birendra Yadav @ Devandra Yadav
- petitioner
Manohar Gupta
- respondent
The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Lakhisarai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court