Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to arrest private respondents. During pendency, petitioner sought withdrawal of the application, which was granted, and the matter was disposed of.
Application disposed of on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.333 of 2015
| ====================================================== Lalita Devi, Wife of Shiv Chandra Nut, Resident of I.T.I. Dhangar Toli, Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S. : Bettiah (Mufasil), District : West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah. 3. The Officer-in-Charge, Bettiah (Mufasil) Police Station, District : West Champaran. 4. Laddu Dhangar, Son of Shiv Charan Dhangar 5. Deo Kali Devi, Wife of Shiv Charan Dhangar 6. Pappu Dhangar, Son of Mansur Dhangar 7. Amresh Dhangar, Son of Ram Kishan Dhangar. All resident of Village : I.T.I. Dhangar Toli, Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S. Bettiah (Mufasil), District : West Champaran. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar (Sc 33) |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 25-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. By way of the present application preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to be issued to the respondents no.2 and 3 to immediately arrest the private respondents no.4 to 7, who have been made accused in Bettiah (Mufasil) P.S. Case No.465 of 2014 registered,inter alia, under Section 364 read with 34 of the Indian |
| Penal Code with a further direction to the respondents to |
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.333 of 2015 (2) dt.25-01-2016
2/2
investigate the case properly.
At the outset, It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. He seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted. The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
N.H./U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for arrest of private respondents under the writ jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalita Devi
The State of Bihar
The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah
The Officer-in-Charge, Bettiah Police Station
Laddu Dhangar
Deo Kali Devi
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
