Allowed

Anil Chand Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 Apr 2016CR. REV./95/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court set aside a revisional order by the Additional District and Sessions Judge which had set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's dismissal of a complaint regarding non-payment of withdrawal from a bank account. The petitioner's application for revision was allowed.

What did the court decide?

The revisional order dated 18.10.2006 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, which set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's dismissal, is hereby set aside.

Anil Chand Thakur and Ors. Vs State of Bihar… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.95 of 2007 dt.19-04-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Revision No.95 of 2007

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- KATIHAR

¶5

=========================================================== 1. Anil Chand Thakur Branch manager Kosi Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Katihar 2. Ravi Ghosh @ Ravi Kumar Ghosh Accountant Officer Kosi Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Mirchaibari Mirchaibari Katihar

¶6

Nawal Kishore Dubey Peon Kosi Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Mirchaibari Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Sarswati Devi W/o Nishi Kant Singh .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

¶7

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Barnawal

¶8

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶9

Date: 19-04-2016

¶10

The petitioners seek revision of the order dated 18.10.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C V, Katihar in Cr. Revision No. 45 of 2005 by which he has set aside the order dated 21.03.2005 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 1460 of 2004.

¶11

The case of the complainant was that they had opened two accounts in Kosi Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Mirchaibari, Katihar and when went to withdraw the money only part of it was paid to them.

¶12

It appears that after full consideration the Magistrate had dismissed the complaint and therefore, there was no justification to set aside the order.

¶13

In such circumstances, the application is allowed and the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.95 of 2007 dt.19-04-2016

¶15

revisional order dated 18.10.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C V, Katihar in Cr. Revision No. 45 of 2005 by which he has set aside the order dated 21.03.2005 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 1460 of 2004 is hereby set aside.

¶16

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶17

Prakash/-
U T

Anil Chand Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Chand Thakur and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar Mahto and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Hari Shankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Damodar Pandey and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Neeta Keskar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar Through Cbi

Sohrayee Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.