In Criminal Revision No. 879 of 2015, the High Court at Patna, via Justice Anjana Prakash, dismissed an oral revision application challenging a conviction and sentence under Sections 363 and 365 IPC following appeals by two sessions courts.
None; the revision application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No. 879 of 2015
=================================================== Pradyuman Sahni Son of Shree Vishwanath Sahni, Resident of Village- Kanti Gosai Tola Police Station Kanti and District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rama Nand Poddar, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. A. Ali Khan (APP)
=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
02. 08.02.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
State.
This revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-11, Muzaffarpur in Cr. Appeal No. 22 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the judgment and order dated 27.02.2012 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (West) in G.R. Case No. 1925 of 2008 (Tr. No. 558 of 2012), by which he has convicted the Petitioner under Sections 363 and 365 IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for three years.
Having gone through the judgment of conviction, I do not find any reason for interference with the same. Hence, the Revision Application stands dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradyuman Sahni
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
