The High Court in revision dismissed the application as the parties had compromised and the sentence was reduced to that already undergone by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.67 of 2016 Arising Out of Complaint Case No.C1-148 Year 2007 District- SITAMARHI =========================================================== Md. Kausar Ali, son of Late Abbass, R/o village- Mirjapur Bazar Tola, P.S.Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Tabassum Khatoon, D/o Sabbir Ahmad, resident of village- Parsa, P.S.Sursand, Dist.- Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks revision of the Judgment dated 30th October, 2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2014.
Considering that now the Parties have compromised themselves, the sentence passed in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2014 by the Sessions judge, Sitamarhi, by the Judgment dated 30.10.2015 is reduced to one already undergone by the Petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the application stands dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/U T
Md. Kausar Ali
The State of Bihar
Tabassum Khatoon
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
