Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for cancellation of bail granted to the private opposite party no. 2, finding no reasons for revocation.
Application for cancellation of bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9556 of 2016 (2) dt.22-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9556 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -819 Year- 2012 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Mishra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishnu Kant Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2016 The petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to the Private Opposite Party no. 2 by order dated 4.3.2014 in Cr. Misc. No. 51512 of 2013 by this Court.. Having gone through the records of the case, I do not find any reasons for cancelling the bail of the Private Opposite Party no. 2. Hence the application is rejected. (Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail granted to the private opposite party no. 2 should be cancelled.
Sunil Kumar Mishra
State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
