Allowed

Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2016CR. MISC./918/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing arrest in a criminal case. The High Court released them on furnishing bail bonds with sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438 CrPC. The court noted allegations of pushing and assault, lack of firearm injuries, and clean antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.918 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2015 Thana -AKBARNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR

¶3

====================================================== 1. Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto, son of Bhikho Mahton 2. Basuki Chaudhary son of Late Chhoti Chaudhary Both are residents of village- Shrirampur, P.S. Akbarnagar, DistrictBhagalpur .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Pravina Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.A.Khan(A.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 15-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶5

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 347, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶6

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is allegation of only pushing the informant and assaulting him by fists and slaps against them though there is allegation of firing also but neither any cartridge has been recovered from the spot nor did anybody suffer firearm injury. It is further contended that the petitioners have got clean antecedents.

¶7

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.918 of 2016 (2) dt.15-01-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

and Basuki Chaudhary be released on bail in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No.83/2015, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶11

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)

¶12

V.K. Pandey/-

¶13

U T

Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Baban Jee Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gopal Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sumit Ray Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Ram @ Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shashi Bhushan Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar