Allowed

Sumit Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2016CR. MISC./1170/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail in a case involving abduction and wrongful confinement. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within six weeks to secure release on bail, considering the victim's statement suggesting previous involvement of the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to surrendering within six weeks to be released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Sumit Ray Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1170 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -276 Year- 2013 Thana -PARWATTA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Sumit Ray S/o Amit Ray Resident of Village- Indira Nagar Rupauhli, P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Anand, Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Nirmal Kr. Sinha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 15-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶5

State.

¶6

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case filed under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the main accused Pankaj Sharma has already been enlarged on bail and after that case, another case, i.e, Parbatta P.S. Case No.95/2014 was lodged by the uncle of the girl in which the girl’s statement was again recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. which has been appended as Annexure 6 in which she has stated that her parents had thrown her out of the house and, thereafter, she had gone with her husband Pankaj Sharma and were living

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1170 of 2016 (2) dt.15-01-2016

¶8

2 / 2

¶9

together in Delhi. She has stated that she has a one and half year old daughter also out of the wedlock.

¶10

Having regards to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today in Parbatta P.S. Case No.276/2013, the above named petitioner, Sumit Ray shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000( Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section(2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶11

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)

¶12

Sanjay-II/-

¶13

U T

Sumit Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Ray v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Baban Jee Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gopal Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Ram @ Manish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shashi Bhushan Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar