Allowed

Ruhujama @ Ruhudu Jama @ Ruhuz Jama @ Ruhuzzaman v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 May 2016CR. MISC./5952/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-source bail order allowing the petitioner's application. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including the petitioner's physical presence at trial and requiring one bailor to be a close relative.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of the like amount subject to specified conditions.

Ruhujama @ Ruhudu Jama @ Ruhuz Jama @ Ruhuzzaman Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5952 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5952 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2012 Thana -AADAPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ruhujama @ Ruhudu Jama @ Ruhuz Jama @ Ruhuzzaman .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Pd. Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3 04-05-2016 It has been submitted that in the counter case instituted for the same occurrence, discharge petition is pending whereas in the present case almost all the witnesses have been examined. The trial Court report also points out the fact that all the witnesses have been examined in the present trial. The petitioner undertakes to be physically present on each date of trial.

¶3

Having considered the aforesaid, the application is allowed. And the Petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of 2^nd Additional District Judge, East Champaran Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 252 of 2014 arising out of Adampur P.S. Case No. 104 of 2012 subject to the conditions,

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5952 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016

¶5

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

¶6

petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,

¶7

That the petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶8

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶9

Prakash/U T

Ruhujama @ Ruhudu Jama @ Ruhuz Jama @ Ruhuzzaman v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruhujama @ Ruhudu Jama @ Ruhuz Jama @ Ruhuzzaman v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Sah @ Rajesh Sao Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kumar Anand and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Kitabul Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar