Patna High Court granted bail to Mahendra and Sharda Chaudhary in a murder case (Section 302 IPC), noting they were parents of the actual accused and had previously allowed pre-arrest bail for co-accused.
Petitioners released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount to the Judicial Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5803 of 2016 (2) dt.17-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5803 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2015 Thana -PHENHARA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
====================================================== 1. Mahendra Chaudhary S/o Rameshwar Chaudhary 2. Sharda Devi W/o Mahendra Chaudhary Both r/o village Fenhara P.S. Dist. East Champaran .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Fenhara P.S. Case No. 55 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner no.1 instigated to kill Arun Chaudhary the son of the informant and then Sudesh Chaudhary started assaulting Arun Chaudhary with axe on his head and when he fell down then also assaulted on his chest abdomen and neck causing his death.
Submission is of false implication and the petitioners are father and mother of that Sudesh Chaudhary, the petitioners were not even present at the place of occurrence but they have been implicated and the petitioner no.1 is said to be an order giver,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5803 of 2016 (2) dt.17-02-2016
in this case Ranjit Chaudhary and Aman Chaudhary have already allowed pre-arrest bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Misc. No. 54806 of 2015 and as such the petitioners who are suffering in custody since 1.10.2015 deserve sympathetic consideration.
Learned A.P.P. fairly submits that Sudesh Chaudhary
is the assailant.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioners are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Fenhara P.S. Case No. 55 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)
siddharth/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners, who are parents of the alleged accused, deserve bail upon claims of false implication.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Criminal Misc. No. 54806 of 2015Referred¶9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Chaudhary
Sharda Devi
State of Bihar
Jitendra Mohan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
