Allowed

Pankaj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Dec 2016CR. MISC./54706/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54706 of 2016, this Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was charged under Sections 457, 380, 511 IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act. Considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents and having lodged a complaint against the informant, bail was allowed upon furnishing security.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner was enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of equal amount.

Pankaj Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.54706 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2016 Thana -UDAKISHANGANJ District- MADHEPURA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pankaj Yadav, Son of Lutan Yadav, Resident of village - Chharrapatti, Ward No. 5, P.S. Uda Kishunganj, District - Madhepura

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Atul Chandra, APP

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 20-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Uda Kishunganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was apprehended with a country made pistol, 05 live cartridges, cash of Rs. 19,790/-, a big screen touch mobile and a small mobile of Samsung Company.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and so far the allegation under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 is concerned, the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54706 of 2016 (2) dt.20-12-2016

¶18

2/2

¶19

F.I.R. itself shows that nothing has been recovered by the police and the same has been handed over to the police by the informant. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has lodged a case against the informant of the instant case before the police vide Annexure-2 of the application and there is injury on the side of the petitioner also. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 18.08.2016.

¶20

Heard the learned APP also.

¶21

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, he has lodged a case against the informant vide Annexure-2 of the application and he is in custody 18.08.2016, let the petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the each amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Uda, Kishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Uda Kishunganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2016.

¶22

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

ajaypd./U T

Pankaj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manager Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Guru Prasad Paswan @ Gurudeo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Digambar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Mustak Ali @ Md. Mustak Ali Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Samrul Vs The State Of Bihar

Indal Mushar Vs The State Of Bihar