Allowed

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2016CR. MISC./49474/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners facing charges under the Indian Penal Code regarding allegations of communal disharmony and obstruction of official duty. Bail was ordered conditioned on the submission of bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and surrendering within thirty days.

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49474 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -MAKER District- SARAN

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar Son of Sri Mudrika Sah

¶5

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Sah Son of Late Ram Naresh Sah

¶6

Sudhaker Mishra Son of Prabhat Kumar Mishra @ Baidya Jee

¶7

Saroj Sah Son of Butai Sah

¶8

Ajit Kumar Sah Son of Nageshwar Sah

¶9

Vikash Kumar Son of Ashok Prasad Mahto

¶10

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Prasad Mahto Son of Ramanand Mahto

¶11

Suraj Kumar Son of Shankar Sah

¶12

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Sah Son of Rajendra Sah All resident of Village- Maker, P.S.- Maker, District- Chapra.

¶13

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶14

Versus

¶15

The State of Bihar

¶16

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance :

¶18

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP

¶19

======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 09-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶22

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 380/427/295A/436 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶23

The petitioners were identified in a mob of 500 people, who had blocked the road in protest against some indecent photographs of the Hindu Idols.

¶24

Allegation is that the petitioners were likely to create

¶25

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49474 of 2016 (2) dt.09-12-2016

¶26

2/2

¶27

a communal disharmony and they obstructed the official to discharge the official duty.

¶28

Considering the nature of allegation as well as claims of the petitioners that they are local shopkeepers, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra/Successor Court in connection with Maker Police Station Case No.89 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶29

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶30

Mkr./-

¶31

U T

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Tufani Yadav @ Tufan Kumar Rana Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Binay Yadav @ Mallu Yadav @ Mattu Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar