Allowed

Chandan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2016CR. MISC./49327/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving Sections 307/34 IPC and 27 Arms Act. The Court ordered their release on bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate.

Chandan Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49327 of 2016 (2) dt.09-12-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49327 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2016 Thana -NATWAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)

¶4

====================================================== 1. Chandan Kumar son of Dayashankar Singh @ Daya Shankar Singh 2. Dayashankar Singh @ Daya Shankar Singh son of Late Uday Narayan Singh Both Residents of Village- Nadaiwa, Police Station- Natwar, DistrictRohtas at Sasaram.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 09-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶12

According to FIR co-accused Guddu Kumar caused firearm injury near the neck of Anish Kumar. The petitioners were also firing however, no injury was caused by the petitioners. Submission is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49327 of 2016 (2) dt.09-12-2016

¶15

before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas/Successor Court in connection with Natwar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶17

Prakash/-

¶18

U T

Chandan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Tufani Yadav @ Tufan Kumar Rana Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Binay Yadav @ Mallu Yadav @ Mattu Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Sah @ Pankaj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar