Allowed

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Yash @ Ajay Kr. Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2016CR. MISC./47834/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Cr. Misc. No. 47834 of 2016, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner charged with offences under Sections 364, 365, 406 and 34 IPC. The Court held that although the petitioner's name appeared in a co-accused's confession regarding arms supply, there was no recovery against him and no criminal antecedent.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Araria.

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Yash @ Ajay Kr. Jha Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47834 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2016 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== AJAY KUMAR JHA @ AJAY YASH @ AJAY KR. JHA

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 21-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶7

The application is for grant of bail for the offence under Sections 364, 365, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired during the course of investigation in confessional statement of the coaccused but nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner

¶9

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has pointed out that on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, name of the petitioner appeared and it is alleged that he supplies arms and there is mobile details also with regard to this petitioner.

¶10

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47834 of 2016 (3) dt.21-12-2016

¶12

2/2

¶13

though the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against him and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case. Further there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Araria in connection with Farbesganj P.S. Case No.131 of 2016.

¶14

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶15

chn/-

¶16

U T

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Yash @ Ajay Kr. Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Yash @ Ajay Kr. Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mustak Ali @ Md. Mustak Ali Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Samrul Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalan Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Shani Srivastava @ Vivek Kumar Srivastav @ Shani Kumar Srivastava @ Vivek Shrivastava Vs The State Of Bihar

Munnu Sharma @ Monu Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar